# WhistleWatch

> How does this company treat the people who speak up? Now you can just look. WhistleWatch is a proposed free public good, not yet built: it would re-organize existing agency and court records into one conduct dossier per company, stamped by legal stage, with a free verified company right of reply. The interest list on the site decides whether it gets built.

WhistleWatch would answer one question before someone takes a job or raises a concern: what happened to the last person at this company who spoke up? It would turn scattered public records into one plain-language conduct dossier per company, showing how it historically responded when employees raised safety, fraud, or ethics concerns. OSHA whistleblower determinations, SEC whistleblower award orders, NLRB decisions, and federal court filings are already published; they are just fragmented across agencies and hard to read. WhistleWatch would file them into one stamped case timeline per company, with a link to every source document. It would not investigate or allege. It would re-organize records that agencies and courts already publish, label every entry by its legal stage (alleged, settled, or adjudicated), and give every company a free, verified right of reply on the same page.

Pricing is simple because there is none. WhistleWatch is free for everyone, readers and companies alike, with no account, no paywall, and no payments of any kind: nothing to buy and nothing to donate to. The company right of reply is also free. The product is at proposal stage, not yet built; a free interest list is open, and the product gets built only if the list shows people want it.

WhistleWatch serves job seekers checking a company's conduct record before accepting an offer, current employees researching how their employer has handled raised concerns, company representatives filing a free verified reply beside their record, journalists tracing retaliation patterns across agencies and dockets, employment lawyers surveying determinations and settlements, and researchers or investor analysts assessing governance and ESG conduct.

A dossier is filed in four passes. First it collects published OSHA determinations, SEC and NLRB orders, federal court filings, and established reporting from their scattered public homes. Then it files each record to the company, ordering it into a case timeline (complaint, finding, outcome), with every entry linked to its source document. Next it stamps every entry with its legal stage: alleged, settled with no admission, or adjudicated; nothing appears without a stamp, because a lawsuit is a claim, not a finding. Finally it invites reply: every company gets a free, domain-verified reply panel pinned beside its record, shown unedited, and engaging improves the company's Conduct Signal.

Every data source is already public, and the plan stages them honestly. At launch: whistleblower retaliation determinations (OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program), whistleblower award and covered-action orders (SEC Office of the Whistleblower), and unfair labor practice decisions (NLRB). Coming soon after: federal court dockets and filings (PACER / CourtListener), retaliation litigation and settlements (EEOC), and established published reporting, which would always be linked and never the sole source for a factual claim.

WhistleWatch commits to staying free and open with no feature gates. It re-organizes the public record and does not investigate or allege. Every entry is stamped with its legal stage and links to its source document. The right of reply is free, domain-verified, and shown unedited. The project is open-source, corrections are public, and it does not sell user data.

For AI agents, WhistleWatch exposes a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server over streamable-HTTP transport with no authentication (the tools are public). The server is mounted at /mcp, so the JSON-RPC endpoint lives one level deeper, at https://whistlewatch.org/mcp/mcp; point streamable-HTTP clients at that full path. Two tools are available via the standard tools/list call. `get_product_info` returns a structured overview of what WhistleWatch is, who it would serve, how it would work, the staged public data sources, the no-payments model, and build status. `submit_interest` joins the free interest list on a user's behalf (email, name, company, persona, message); valid persona values are job_seeker, current_employee, company_representative, journalist, employment_lawyer, researcher, investor_analyst, and other.

## Docs

- [Homepage](https://whistlewatch.org/): the WhistleWatch landing page, with the four-step method, the stage-stamp system, and every data source listed
- [Live demo](https://whistlewatch.org/demo): interactive three-dossier sampler with stamped case timelines, the Conduct Signal, and a company right-of-reply panel

## For AI agents

- [MCP endpoint](https://whistlewatch.org/mcp/mcp): streamable-HTTP JSON-RPC endpoint for get_product_info and submit_interest (the server is mounted at /mcp)
- [MCP discovery](https://whistlewatch.org/.well-known/mcp.json): machine-readable advertisement of the MCP server and its tools
- [OpenAPI spec](https://whistlewatch.org/openapi.json): REST description of the site's HTTP endpoints for non-MCP agents
- [security.txt](https://whistlewatch.org/.well-known/security.txt): security contact for the site

## Optional

- [Contact](mailto:hello@whistlewatch.org): reach the WhistleWatch team directly
- [Sitemap](https://whistlewatch.org/sitemap.xml): crawlable URL list for the site